Implement canonical network readiness derivation
This commit is contained in:
parent
d274e1835d
commit
304fb225d6
4 changed files with 1149 additions and 11 deletions
|
|
@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
|
|||
pub mod codec;
|
||||
pub mod configuration;
|
||||
pub mod identity;
|
||||
pub mod network;
|
||||
pub mod protocol;
|
||||
pub mod records;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
642
crates/lazaret-core/src/network.rs
Normal file
642
crates/lazaret-core/src/network.rs
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,642 @@
|
|||
use std::collections::{BTreeMap, BTreeSet};
|
||||
use std::fmt;
|
||||
|
||||
use sha2::{Digest, Sha256};
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::codec::{CodecError, encode};
|
||||
use crate::configuration::ResolvedDomainConfiguration;
|
||||
use crate::identity::{
|
||||
ConfigurationFingerprint, DerivedPolicyDigest, DomainId, GenerationId, NamespaceIdentity,
|
||||
NetworkSidecarId, PidfsProcessIdentityV1, ReadinessFingerprint,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use crate::records::{
|
||||
AddressFamily, AddressFamilyDisposition, AddressFamilyDispositionValue,
|
||||
DERIVED_NETWORK_POLICY_SCHEMA_ID, DefaultAction, DerivedNetworkPolicy,
|
||||
DerivedNetworkPolicyFields, IpAddress, IpNetwork, NETWORK_READINESS_IDENTITY_SCHEMA_ID,
|
||||
NetworkObservation, NetworkReachabilityProbe, NetworkReadinessAttestation,
|
||||
NetworkReadinessEvidence, NetworkReadinessIdentity, NetworkReadinessIdentityFields,
|
||||
PolicyAction, PolicyDelivery, PrefixRule, Resolver,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Eq, PartialEq)]
|
||||
pub struct CanonicalDerivedNetworkPolicy {
|
||||
policy: DerivedNetworkPolicy,
|
||||
canonical_bytes: Vec<u8>,
|
||||
digest: DerivedPolicyDigest,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl CanonicalDerivedNetworkPolicy {
|
||||
#[must_use]
|
||||
pub const fn policy(&self) -> &DerivedNetworkPolicy {
|
||||
&self.policy
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[must_use]
|
||||
pub fn canonical_bytes(&self) -> &[u8] {
|
||||
&self.canonical_bytes
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[must_use]
|
||||
pub const fn digest(&self) -> DerivedPolicyDigest {
|
||||
self.digest
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Eq, PartialEq)]
|
||||
pub struct ReachabilityExpectation {
|
||||
pub denied_destinations: Vec<IpAddress>,
|
||||
pub permitted_destinations: Vec<IpAddress>,
|
||||
pub dns_queries: Vec<DnsQueryExpectation>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Eq, Ord, PartialEq, PartialOrd)]
|
||||
pub struct DnsQueryExpectation {
|
||||
pub resolver: IpAddress,
|
||||
pub query_name: String,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
|
||||
pub struct ReadinessExpectation<'a> {
|
||||
pub domain_id: DomainId,
|
||||
pub generation_id: GenerationId,
|
||||
pub configuration_fingerprint: ConfigurationFingerprint,
|
||||
pub network_sidecar_id: NetworkSidecarId,
|
||||
pub enforcement_namespace: NamespaceIdentity,
|
||||
pub runtime_supervisor: &'a PidfsProcessIdentityV1,
|
||||
pub connectivity_helper: &'a PidfsProcessIdentityV1,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Eq, PartialEq)]
|
||||
pub enum NetworkValidationErrorKind {
|
||||
AddressFamilies,
|
||||
DefaultActions,
|
||||
Prefix,
|
||||
PrefixConflict,
|
||||
Resolver,
|
||||
CanonicalEncoding,
|
||||
Attestation,
|
||||
Reachability,
|
||||
Evidence,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Debug)]
|
||||
pub struct NetworkValidationError {
|
||||
kind: NetworkValidationErrorKind,
|
||||
detail: &'static str,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl NetworkValidationError {
|
||||
const fn new(kind: NetworkValidationErrorKind, detail: &'static str) -> Self {
|
||||
Self { kind, detail }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[must_use]
|
||||
pub const fn kind(&self) -> NetworkValidationErrorKind {
|
||||
self.kind
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl fmt::Display for NetworkValidationError {
|
||||
fn fmt(&self, formatter: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
|
||||
write!(formatter, "{}", self.detail)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl std::error::Error for NetworkValidationError {}
|
||||
|
||||
impl From<CodecError> for NetworkValidationError {
|
||||
fn from(_: CodecError) -> Self {
|
||||
Self::new(
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::CanonicalEncoding,
|
||||
"network document cannot be canonically encoded",
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Derives the v1 policy from one resolved trusted-host configuration.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// # Errors
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Returns an error when resolver or canonical policy validation fails.
|
||||
pub fn derive_ipv4_policy(
|
||||
configuration: &ResolvedDomainConfiguration,
|
||||
resolvers: impl IntoIterator<Item = IpAddress>,
|
||||
) -> Result<CanonicalDerivedNetworkPolicy, NetworkValidationError> {
|
||||
let prefix_rules = configuration
|
||||
.effective_allow_prefixes()
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|prefix| PrefixRule {
|
||||
family: AddressFamily::Ipv4,
|
||||
network: IpNetwork {
|
||||
address: IpAddress::V4(prefix.address()),
|
||||
prefix_length: prefix.prefix_length(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
action: PolicyAction::Allow,
|
||||
})
|
||||
.chain(
|
||||
configuration
|
||||
.effective_deny_prefixes()
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|prefix| PrefixRule {
|
||||
family: AddressFamily::Ipv4,
|
||||
network: IpNetwork {
|
||||
address: IpAddress::V4(prefix.address()),
|
||||
prefix_length: prefix.prefix_length(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
action: PolicyAction::Deny,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
)
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
derive_policy(DerivedNetworkPolicyFields {
|
||||
address_families: vec![
|
||||
AddressFamilyDisposition {
|
||||
family: AddressFamily::Ipv4,
|
||||
disposition: AddressFamilyDispositionValue::Enabled,
|
||||
},
|
||||
AddressFamilyDisposition {
|
||||
family: AddressFamily::Ipv6,
|
||||
disposition: AddressFamilyDispositionValue::Disabled,
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
default_actions: vec![DefaultAction {
|
||||
family: AddressFamily::Ipv4,
|
||||
action: PolicyAction::Allow,
|
||||
}],
|
||||
prefix_rules,
|
||||
resolvers: resolvers
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(|address| Resolver {
|
||||
family: AddressFamily::Ipv4,
|
||||
address,
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect(),
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Validates, normalizes, and fingerprints a derived policy document.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// # Errors
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Returns an error for an invalid family, prefix, resolver, conflict, or encoding.
|
||||
pub fn derive_policy(
|
||||
mut fields: DerivedNetworkPolicyFields,
|
||||
) -> Result<CanonicalDerivedNetworkPolicy, NetworkValidationError> {
|
||||
validate_address_families(&fields.address_families)?;
|
||||
validate_default_actions(&fields.default_actions)?;
|
||||
validate_prefix_rules(&fields.prefix_rules)?;
|
||||
validate_resolvers(&fields.resolvers)?;
|
||||
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.address_families
|
||||
.sort_unstable_by_key(|item| item.family);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.default_actions
|
||||
.sort_unstable_by_key(|item| item.family);
|
||||
fields.prefix_rules.sort_unstable();
|
||||
fields.resolvers.sort_unstable();
|
||||
|
||||
let policy = DerivedNetworkPolicy::v1(fields);
|
||||
let canonical_bytes = encode(&policy)?;
|
||||
let digest = domain_digest(DERIVED_NETWORK_POLICY_SCHEMA_ID, &canonical_bytes);
|
||||
Ok(CanonicalDerivedNetworkPolicy {
|
||||
policy,
|
||||
canonical_bytes,
|
||||
digest: DerivedPolicyDigest::new(digest),
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[must_use]
|
||||
pub fn readiness_identity(attestation: &NetworkReadinessAttestation) -> NetworkReadinessIdentity {
|
||||
NetworkReadinessIdentity::v1(NetworkReadinessIdentityFields {
|
||||
domain_id: attestation.domain_id,
|
||||
generation_id: attestation.generation_id,
|
||||
configuration_fingerprint: attestation.configuration_fingerprint,
|
||||
network_sidecar_id: attestation.network_sidecar_id,
|
||||
derived_policy_digest: attestation.derived_policy_digest,
|
||||
enforcement_namespace: attestation.enforcement_namespace,
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Encodes the v1 readiness identity in its canonical form.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// # Errors
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Returns an error when canonical encoding fails.
|
||||
pub fn canonical_readiness_identity_bytes(
|
||||
identity: &NetworkReadinessIdentity,
|
||||
) -> Result<Vec<u8>, NetworkValidationError> {
|
||||
Ok(encode(identity)?)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Computes the domain-separated readiness fingerprint.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// # Errors
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Returns an error when canonical identity encoding fails.
|
||||
pub fn readiness_fingerprint(
|
||||
identity: &NetworkReadinessIdentity,
|
||||
) -> Result<ReadinessFingerprint, NetworkValidationError> {
|
||||
let canonical_bytes = canonical_readiness_identity_bytes(identity)?;
|
||||
Ok(ReadinessFingerprint::new(domain_digest(
|
||||
NETWORK_READINESS_IDENTITY_SCHEMA_ID,
|
||||
&canonical_bytes,
|
||||
)))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Binds validated attestation and reachability results into readiness evidence.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// # Errors
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Returns an error for any identity, observation, policy, or probe mismatch.
|
||||
pub fn accept_network_readiness(
|
||||
policy: &CanonicalDerivedNetworkPolicy,
|
||||
expectation: &ReadinessExpectation<'_>,
|
||||
attestation: NetworkReadinessAttestation,
|
||||
reachability: NetworkReachabilityProbe,
|
||||
expected_reachability: &ReachabilityExpectation,
|
||||
) -> Result<NetworkReadinessEvidence, NetworkValidationError> {
|
||||
validate_attestation(policy, expectation, &attestation)?;
|
||||
validate_reachability(
|
||||
policy.policy(),
|
||||
expectation,
|
||||
&reachability,
|
||||
expected_reachability,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
let identity = readiness_identity(&attestation);
|
||||
let fingerprint = readiness_fingerprint(&identity)?;
|
||||
Ok(NetworkReadinessEvidence {
|
||||
domain_id: expectation.domain_id,
|
||||
generation_id: expectation.generation_id,
|
||||
network_sidecar_id: expectation.network_sidecar_id,
|
||||
readiness_fingerprint: fingerprint,
|
||||
attestation,
|
||||
readiness_identity: identity,
|
||||
reachability_probe: reachability,
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Revalidates persisted readiness evidence against current generation authority.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// # Errors
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Returns an error for any identity, projection, fingerprint, or probe mismatch.
|
||||
pub fn validate_network_readiness_evidence(
|
||||
policy: &CanonicalDerivedNetworkPolicy,
|
||||
expectation: &ReadinessExpectation<'_>,
|
||||
evidence: &NetworkReadinessEvidence,
|
||||
expected_reachability: &ReachabilityExpectation,
|
||||
) -> Result<(), NetworkValidationError> {
|
||||
if evidence.domain_id != expectation.domain_id
|
||||
|| evidence.generation_id != expectation.generation_id
|
||||
|| evidence.network_sidecar_id != expectation.network_sidecar_id
|
||||
{
|
||||
return Err(NetworkValidationError::new(
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::Evidence,
|
||||
"network readiness evidence identity mismatch",
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
validate_attestation(policy, expectation, &evidence.attestation)?;
|
||||
let projected = readiness_identity(&evidence.attestation);
|
||||
let fingerprint = readiness_fingerprint(&projected)?;
|
||||
if evidence.readiness_identity != projected || evidence.readiness_fingerprint != fingerprint {
|
||||
return Err(NetworkValidationError::new(
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::Evidence,
|
||||
"network readiness projection or fingerprint mismatch",
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
validate_reachability(
|
||||
policy.policy(),
|
||||
expectation,
|
||||
&evidence.reachability_probe,
|
||||
expected_reachability,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn validate_address_families(
|
||||
dispositions: &[AddressFamilyDisposition],
|
||||
) -> Result<(), NetworkValidationError> {
|
||||
let expected = BTreeMap::from([
|
||||
(AddressFamily::Ipv4, AddressFamilyDispositionValue::Enabled),
|
||||
(AddressFamily::Ipv6, AddressFamilyDispositionValue::Disabled),
|
||||
]);
|
||||
let actual: BTreeMap<_, _> = dispositions
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|item| (item.family, item.disposition))
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
if dispositions.len() != expected.len() || actual != expected {
|
||||
return Err(NetworkValidationError::new(
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::AddressFamilies,
|
||||
"v1 requires IPv4 enabled and IPv6 disabled exactly once",
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn validate_default_actions(actions: &[DefaultAction]) -> Result<(), NetworkValidationError> {
|
||||
if actions
|
||||
!= [DefaultAction {
|
||||
family: AddressFamily::Ipv4,
|
||||
action: PolicyAction::Allow,
|
||||
}]
|
||||
{
|
||||
return Err(NetworkValidationError::new(
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::DefaultActions,
|
||||
"v1 requires one IPv4 default-allow action",
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn validate_prefix_rules(rules: &[PrefixRule]) -> Result<(), NetworkValidationError> {
|
||||
let mut actions = BTreeMap::new();
|
||||
for rule in rules {
|
||||
validate_network(rule.family, rule.network)?;
|
||||
if rule.family != AddressFamily::Ipv4 {
|
||||
return Err(NetworkValidationError::new(
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::AddressFamilies,
|
||||
"disabled address family has a prefix rule",
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
match actions.insert((rule.family, rule.network), rule.action) {
|
||||
Some(previous) if previous != rule.action => {
|
||||
return Err(NetworkValidationError::new(
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::PrefixConflict,
|
||||
"equal prefix has conflicting actions",
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
Some(_) => {
|
||||
return Err(NetworkValidationError::new(
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::Prefix,
|
||||
"duplicate prefix rule",
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
None => {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
for network in [
|
||||
([10, 0, 0, 0], 8),
|
||||
([172, 16, 0, 0], 12),
|
||||
([192, 168, 0, 0], 16),
|
||||
] {
|
||||
let required = IpNetwork {
|
||||
address: IpAddress::V4(network.0),
|
||||
prefix_length: network.1,
|
||||
};
|
||||
if actions.get(&(AddressFamily::Ipv4, required)) != Some(&PolicyAction::Deny) {
|
||||
return Err(NetworkValidationError::new(
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::Prefix,
|
||||
"v1 policy is missing a default private-network deny",
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn validate_resolvers(resolvers: &[Resolver]) -> Result<(), NetworkValidationError> {
|
||||
if resolvers.is_empty() {
|
||||
return Err(NetworkValidationError::new(
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::Resolver,
|
||||
"derived policy requires a resolver",
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
let mut seen = BTreeSet::new();
|
||||
for resolver in resolvers {
|
||||
if resolver.family != AddressFamily::Ipv4
|
||||
|| address_family(resolver.address) != resolver.family
|
||||
{
|
||||
return Err(NetworkValidationError::new(
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::Resolver,
|
||||
"resolver address family is disabled or mismatched",
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !seen.insert(*resolver) {
|
||||
return Err(NetworkValidationError::new(
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::Resolver,
|
||||
"duplicate resolver",
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn validate_network(
|
||||
family: AddressFamily,
|
||||
network: IpNetwork,
|
||||
) -> Result<(), NetworkValidationError> {
|
||||
if address_family(network.address) != family {
|
||||
return Err(NetworkValidationError::new(
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::Prefix,
|
||||
"prefix address family mismatch",
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
let (bytes, maximum) = match network.address {
|
||||
IpAddress::V4(bytes) => (bytes.to_vec(), 32),
|
||||
IpAddress::V6(bytes) => (bytes.to_vec(), 128),
|
||||
};
|
||||
if network.prefix_length > maximum || !is_network_address(&bytes, network.prefix_length) {
|
||||
return Err(NetworkValidationError::new(
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::Prefix,
|
||||
"prefix is not a canonical network",
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn is_network_address(bytes: &[u8], prefix_length: u8) -> bool {
|
||||
let complete = usize::from(prefix_length / 8);
|
||||
let remainder = prefix_length % 8;
|
||||
if remainder != 0 && bytes[complete] & (u8::MAX >> remainder) != 0 {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
let start = complete + usize::from(remainder != 0);
|
||||
bytes[start..].iter().all(|byte| *byte == 0)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn validate_attestation(
|
||||
policy: &CanonicalDerivedNetworkPolicy,
|
||||
expected: &ReadinessExpectation<'_>,
|
||||
attestation: &NetworkReadinessAttestation,
|
||||
) -> Result<(), NetworkValidationError> {
|
||||
if attestation.domain_id != expected.domain_id
|
||||
|| attestation.generation_id != expected.generation_id
|
||||
|| attestation.configuration_fingerprint != expected.configuration_fingerprint
|
||||
|| attestation.network_sidecar_id != expected.network_sidecar_id
|
||||
|| attestation.derived_policy_digest != policy.digest()
|
||||
|| attestation.enforcement_namespace != expected.enforcement_namespace
|
||||
|| attestation.runtime_supervisor != *expected.runtime_supervisor
|
||||
|| attestation.connectivity_helper != *expected.connectivity_helper
|
||||
|| !valid_observation(&attestation.observation)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return Err(NetworkValidationError::new(
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::Attestation,
|
||||
"network readiness attestation mismatch",
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
for route in &attestation.observation.observed_routes {
|
||||
validate_network(address_family(route.address), *route)?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn valid_observation(observation: &NetworkObservation) -> bool {
|
||||
observation.policy_delivery == PolicyDelivery::SealedMemfd
|
||||
&& observation.helper_ready
|
||||
&& observation.routes_attested
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn validate_reachability(
|
||||
policy: &DerivedNetworkPolicy,
|
||||
expected: &ReadinessExpectation<'_>,
|
||||
probe: &NetworkReachabilityProbe,
|
||||
expected_results: &ReachabilityExpectation,
|
||||
) -> Result<(), NetworkValidationError> {
|
||||
if probe.domain_id != expected.domain_id
|
||||
|| probe.generation_id != expected.generation_id
|
||||
|| probe.enforcement_namespace != expected.enforcement_namespace
|
||||
|| expected_results.denied_destinations.is_empty()
|
||||
|| expected_results.permitted_destinations.is_empty()
|
||||
|| expected_results.dns_queries.is_empty()
|
||||
{
|
||||
return reachability_error();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let denied = exact_observations(
|
||||
&expected_results.denied_destinations,
|
||||
&probe.denied_destinations,
|
||||
|item| (item.destination, item.unreachable),
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
let permitted = exact_observations(
|
||||
&expected_results.permitted_destinations,
|
||||
&probe.permitted_destinations,
|
||||
|item| (item.destination, item.reachable),
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
if denied.iter().any(|(_, passed)| !passed)
|
||||
|| permitted.iter().any(|(_, passed)| !passed)
|
||||
|| expected_results
|
||||
.denied_destinations
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.any(|address| effective_action(policy, *address) != Some(PolicyAction::Deny))
|
||||
|| expected_results
|
||||
.permitted_destinations
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.any(|address| effective_action(policy, *address) != Some(PolicyAction::Allow))
|
||||
{
|
||||
return reachability_error();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let expected_dns: BTreeSet<_> = expected_results.dns_queries.iter().cloned().collect();
|
||||
let actual_dns: BTreeSet<_> = probe
|
||||
.dns_observations
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|item| DnsQueryExpectation {
|
||||
resolver: item.resolver,
|
||||
query_name: item.query_name.clone(),
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
let resolvers: BTreeSet<_> = policy
|
||||
.resolvers
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|resolver| resolver.address)
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
if expected_dns.len() != expected_results.dns_queries.len()
|
||||
|| actual_dns.len() != probe.dns_observations.len()
|
||||
|| actual_dns != expected_dns
|
||||
|| probe.dns_observations.iter().any(|item| {
|
||||
item.query_name.is_empty()
|
||||
|| !resolvers.contains(&item.resolver)
|
||||
|| item.resolved_addresses.is_empty()
|
||||
|| item
|
||||
.resolved_addresses
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.any(|address| address_family(*address) != AddressFamily::Ipv4)
|
||||
})
|
||||
{
|
||||
return reachability_error();
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn exact_observations<T, F>(
|
||||
expected: &[IpAddress],
|
||||
actual: &[T],
|
||||
project: F,
|
||||
) -> Result<BTreeSet<(IpAddress, bool)>, NetworkValidationError>
|
||||
where
|
||||
F: Fn(&T) -> (IpAddress, bool),
|
||||
{
|
||||
let expected_items: BTreeSet<_> = expected.iter().copied().collect();
|
||||
let actual_items: BTreeSet<_> = actual.iter().map(project).collect();
|
||||
let actual_addresses: BTreeSet<_> = actual_items.iter().map(|(address, _)| *address).collect();
|
||||
if expected_items.len() != expected.len()
|
||||
|| actual_items.len() != actual.len()
|
||||
|| expected_items.len() != actual_items.len()
|
||||
|| expected_items.len() != actual_addresses.len()
|
||||
|| actual_addresses != expected_items
|
||||
{
|
||||
return reachability_error();
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(actual_items)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn effective_action(policy: &DerivedNetworkPolicy, address: IpAddress) -> Option<PolicyAction> {
|
||||
let family = address_family(address);
|
||||
let disposition = policy
|
||||
.address_families
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.find(|item| item.family == family)?;
|
||||
if disposition.disposition != AddressFamilyDispositionValue::Enabled {
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
policy
|
||||
.prefix_rules
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.filter(|rule| rule.family == family && network_contains(rule.network, address))
|
||||
.max_by_key(|rule| rule.network.prefix_length)
|
||||
.map(|rule| rule.action)
|
||||
.or_else(|| {
|
||||
policy
|
||||
.default_actions
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.find(|item| item.family == family)
|
||||
.map(|item| item.action)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn network_contains(network: IpNetwork, address: IpAddress) -> bool {
|
||||
let prefix_length = network.prefix_length;
|
||||
let (network, address) = match (network.address, address) {
|
||||
(IpAddress::V4(network), IpAddress::V4(address)) => (network.to_vec(), address.to_vec()),
|
||||
(IpAddress::V6(network), IpAddress::V6(address)) => (network.to_vec(), address.to_vec()),
|
||||
_ => return false,
|
||||
};
|
||||
let complete = usize::from(prefix_length / 8);
|
||||
let remainder = prefix_length % 8;
|
||||
if network[..complete] != address[..complete] {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
remainder == 0
|
||||
|| network[complete] & (u8::MAX << (8 - remainder))
|
||||
== address[complete] & (u8::MAX << (8 - remainder))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const fn address_family(address: IpAddress) -> AddressFamily {
|
||||
match address {
|
||||
IpAddress::V4(_) => AddressFamily::Ipv4,
|
||||
IpAddress::V6(_) => AddressFamily::Ipv6,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn domain_digest(schema_id: &str, canonical_bytes: &[u8]) -> [u8; 32] {
|
||||
let mut hasher = Sha256::new();
|
||||
hasher.update(schema_id.as_bytes());
|
||||
hasher.update([0]);
|
||||
hasher.update(canonical_bytes);
|
||||
hasher.finalize().into()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn reachability_error<T>() -> Result<T, NetworkValidationError> {
|
||||
Err(NetworkValidationError::new(
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::Reachability,
|
||||
"network reachability evidence mismatch",
|
||||
))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -3,56 +3,56 @@ use super::{
|
|||
NamespaceIdentity, NetworkSidecarId, PidfsProcessIdentityV1, ReadinessFingerprint, Serialize,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, PartialEq, Serialize)]
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, Ord, PartialEq, PartialOrd, Serialize)]
|
||||
pub enum AddressFamily {
|
||||
Ipv4,
|
||||
Ipv6,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, PartialEq, Serialize)]
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, Ord, PartialEq, PartialOrd, Serialize)]
|
||||
pub enum AddressFamilyDispositionValue {
|
||||
Enabled,
|
||||
Disabled,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, PartialEq, Serialize)]
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, Ord, PartialEq, PartialOrd, Serialize)]
|
||||
pub struct AddressFamilyDisposition {
|
||||
pub family: AddressFamily,
|
||||
pub disposition: AddressFamilyDispositionValue,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, Hash, PartialEq, Serialize)]
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, Hash, Ord, PartialEq, PartialOrd, Serialize)]
|
||||
pub enum IpAddress {
|
||||
V4([u8; 4]),
|
||||
V6([u8; 16]),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, PartialEq, Serialize)]
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, Ord, PartialEq, PartialOrd, Serialize)]
|
||||
pub struct IpNetwork {
|
||||
pub address: IpAddress,
|
||||
pub prefix_length: u8,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, PartialEq, Serialize)]
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, Ord, PartialEq, PartialOrd, Serialize)]
|
||||
pub enum PolicyAction {
|
||||
Allow,
|
||||
Deny,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, PartialEq, Serialize)]
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, Ord, PartialEq, PartialOrd, Serialize)]
|
||||
pub struct DefaultAction {
|
||||
pub family: AddressFamily,
|
||||
pub action: PolicyAction,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, PartialEq, Serialize)]
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, Ord, PartialEq, PartialOrd, Serialize)]
|
||||
pub struct PrefixRule {
|
||||
pub family: AddressFamily,
|
||||
pub network: IpNetwork,
|
||||
pub action: PolicyAction,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, PartialEq, Serialize)]
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Deserialize, Eq, Ord, PartialEq, PartialOrd, Serialize)]
|
||||
pub struct Resolver {
|
||||
pub family: AddressFamily,
|
||||
pub address: IpAddress,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
485
crates/lazaret-core/tests/network.rs
Normal file
485
crates/lazaret-core/tests/network.rs
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,485 @@
|
|||
use std::fmt::Write;
|
||||
|
||||
use lazaret_core::identity::{
|
||||
BootId, ConfigurationFingerprint, DerivedPolicyDigest, DeviceId, DomainId, GenerationId,
|
||||
HostPidLocator, InodeId, NamespaceIdentity, NetworkSidecarId, PidfsDeviceId, PidfsInodeId,
|
||||
PidfsProcessAuthorityV1, PidfsProcessIdentityV1, ProcessStartTimeTicks, ReadinessFingerprint,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use lazaret_core::network::{
|
||||
DnsQueryExpectation, NetworkValidationErrorKind, ReachabilityExpectation, ReadinessExpectation,
|
||||
accept_network_readiness, canonical_readiness_identity_bytes, derive_policy,
|
||||
readiness_fingerprint, readiness_identity, validate_network_readiness_evidence,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use lazaret_core::records::{
|
||||
AddressFamily, AddressFamilyDisposition, AddressFamilyDispositionValue, DefaultAction,
|
||||
DeniedDestinationObservation, DerivedNetworkPolicyFields, DnsObservation, IpAddress, IpNetwork,
|
||||
NetworkObservation, NetworkReachabilityProbe, NetworkReadinessAttestation,
|
||||
NetworkReadinessAttestationFields, PermittedDestinationObservation, PolicyAction,
|
||||
PolicyDelivery, PrefixRule, Resolver,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
type AttestationMutation = fn(&mut NetworkReadinessAttestation);
|
||||
type EvidenceMutation = fn(&mut lazaret_core::records::NetworkReadinessEvidence);
|
||||
type ProbeMutation = fn(&mut NetworkReachabilityProbe);
|
||||
|
||||
fn repeated(value: u8) -> [u8; 32] {
|
||||
[value; 32]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn namespace() -> NamespaceIdentity {
|
||||
NamespaceIdentity {
|
||||
device: DeviceId::new(41),
|
||||
inode: InodeId::new(42),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn process(value: u8) -> PidfsProcessIdentityV1 {
|
||||
PidfsProcessIdentityV1::new(
|
||||
PidfsProcessAuthorityV1 {
|
||||
boot_id: BootId::new([value; 16]),
|
||||
pidfs_st_dev: PidfsDeviceId::new(u64::from(value)),
|
||||
pidfs_st_ino: PidfsInodeId::new(u64::from(value) + 1),
|
||||
},
|
||||
HostPidLocator::new(u32::from(value)),
|
||||
ProcessStartTimeTicks::new(u64::from(value) + 2),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn policy_fields() -> DerivedNetworkPolicyFields {
|
||||
DerivedNetworkPolicyFields {
|
||||
address_families: vec![
|
||||
AddressFamilyDisposition {
|
||||
family: AddressFamily::Ipv4,
|
||||
disposition: AddressFamilyDispositionValue::Enabled,
|
||||
},
|
||||
AddressFamilyDisposition {
|
||||
family: AddressFamily::Ipv6,
|
||||
disposition: AddressFamilyDispositionValue::Disabled,
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
default_actions: vec![DefaultAction {
|
||||
family: AddressFamily::Ipv4,
|
||||
action: PolicyAction::Allow,
|
||||
}],
|
||||
prefix_rules: vec![
|
||||
PrefixRule {
|
||||
family: AddressFamily::Ipv4,
|
||||
network: IpNetwork {
|
||||
address: IpAddress::V4([10, 0, 0, 0]),
|
||||
prefix_length: 8,
|
||||
},
|
||||
action: PolicyAction::Deny,
|
||||
},
|
||||
PrefixRule {
|
||||
family: AddressFamily::Ipv4,
|
||||
network: IpNetwork {
|
||||
address: IpAddress::V4([10, 20, 0, 0]),
|
||||
prefix_length: 16,
|
||||
},
|
||||
action: PolicyAction::Allow,
|
||||
},
|
||||
PrefixRule {
|
||||
family: AddressFamily::Ipv4,
|
||||
network: IpNetwork {
|
||||
address: IpAddress::V4([172, 16, 0, 0]),
|
||||
prefix_length: 12,
|
||||
},
|
||||
action: PolicyAction::Deny,
|
||||
},
|
||||
PrefixRule {
|
||||
family: AddressFamily::Ipv4,
|
||||
network: IpNetwork {
|
||||
address: IpAddress::V4([192, 168, 0, 0]),
|
||||
prefix_length: 16,
|
||||
},
|
||||
action: PolicyAction::Deny,
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
resolvers: vec![Resolver {
|
||||
family: AddressFamily::Ipv4,
|
||||
address: IpAddress::V4([192, 0, 2, 53]),
|
||||
}],
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct Fixture {
|
||||
policy: lazaret_core::network::CanonicalDerivedNetworkPolicy,
|
||||
runtime_supervisor: PidfsProcessIdentityV1,
|
||||
connectivity_helper: PidfsProcessIdentityV1,
|
||||
attestation: NetworkReadinessAttestation,
|
||||
probe: NetworkReachabilityProbe,
|
||||
reachability: ReachabilityExpectation,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl Fixture {
|
||||
fn new() -> Self {
|
||||
let policy = derive_policy(policy_fields()).unwrap();
|
||||
let runtime_supervisor = process(51);
|
||||
let connectivity_helper = process(61);
|
||||
let attestation = NetworkReadinessAttestation::v1(NetworkReadinessAttestationFields {
|
||||
domain_id: DomainId::new(repeated(1)),
|
||||
generation_id: GenerationId::new(2),
|
||||
configuration_fingerprint: ConfigurationFingerprint::new(repeated(3)),
|
||||
network_sidecar_id: NetworkSidecarId::new(repeated(4)),
|
||||
derived_policy_digest: policy.digest(),
|
||||
enforcement_namespace: namespace(),
|
||||
runtime_supervisor,
|
||||
connectivity_helper,
|
||||
observation: NetworkObservation {
|
||||
policy_delivery: PolicyDelivery::SealedMemfd,
|
||||
helper_ready: true,
|
||||
observed_routes: vec![IpNetwork {
|
||||
address: IpAddress::V4([10, 0, 0, 0]),
|
||||
prefix_length: 8,
|
||||
}],
|
||||
routes_attested: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
let probe = NetworkReachabilityProbe {
|
||||
domain_id: DomainId::new(repeated(1)),
|
||||
generation_id: GenerationId::new(2),
|
||||
enforcement_namespace: namespace(),
|
||||
denied_destinations: vec![DeniedDestinationObservation {
|
||||
destination: IpAddress::V4([10, 1, 2, 3]),
|
||||
unreachable: true,
|
||||
}],
|
||||
permitted_destinations: vec![PermittedDestinationObservation {
|
||||
destination: IpAddress::V4([10, 20, 1, 2]),
|
||||
reachable: true,
|
||||
}],
|
||||
dns_observations: vec![DnsObservation {
|
||||
resolver: IpAddress::V4([192, 0, 2, 53]),
|
||||
query_name: "sandbox.invalid".into(),
|
||||
resolved_addresses: vec![IpAddress::V4([192, 0, 2, 10])],
|
||||
}],
|
||||
};
|
||||
let reachability = ReachabilityExpectation {
|
||||
denied_destinations: vec![IpAddress::V4([10, 1, 2, 3])],
|
||||
permitted_destinations: vec![IpAddress::V4([10, 20, 1, 2])],
|
||||
dns_queries: vec![DnsQueryExpectation {
|
||||
resolver: IpAddress::V4([192, 0, 2, 53]),
|
||||
query_name: "sandbox.invalid".into(),
|
||||
}],
|
||||
};
|
||||
Self {
|
||||
policy,
|
||||
runtime_supervisor,
|
||||
connectivity_helper,
|
||||
attestation,
|
||||
probe,
|
||||
reachability,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn expectation(&self) -> ReadinessExpectation<'_> {
|
||||
ReadinessExpectation {
|
||||
domain_id: DomainId::new(repeated(1)),
|
||||
generation_id: GenerationId::new(2),
|
||||
configuration_fingerprint: ConfigurationFingerprint::new(repeated(3)),
|
||||
network_sidecar_id: NetworkSidecarId::new(repeated(4)),
|
||||
enforcement_namespace: namespace(),
|
||||
runtime_supervisor: &self.runtime_supervisor,
|
||||
connectivity_helper: &self.connectivity_helper,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn evidence(&self) -> lazaret_core::records::NetworkReadinessEvidence {
|
||||
accept_network_readiness(
|
||||
&self.policy,
|
||||
&self.expectation(),
|
||||
self.attestation.clone(),
|
||||
self.probe.clone(),
|
||||
&self.reachability,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn hex(bytes: &[u8]) -> String {
|
||||
bytes.iter().fold(String::new(), |mut encoded, byte| {
|
||||
write!(encoded, "{byte:02x}").unwrap();
|
||||
encoded
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn canonical_policy_and_readiness_vectors_are_stable() {
|
||||
let fixture = Fixture::new();
|
||||
let identity = readiness_identity(&fixture.attestation);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
hex(fixture.policy.canonical_bytes()),
|
||||
"216c617a617265742d646572697665642d6e6574776f726b2d706f6c6963792d763102000001010100000400000a000000080100000a14000010000000ac1000000c010000c0a800001001010000c0000235"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
hex(fixture.policy.digest().as_bytes()),
|
||||
"01b72b130912b96c591271308b6b54f99431b90b0f6eee252eb4ada6aa0a42e3"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
hex(&canonical_readiness_identity_bytes(&identity).unwrap()),
|
||||
"256c617a617265742d6e6574776f726b2d72656164696e6573732d6964656e746974792d76310101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101020303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040401b72b130912b96c591271308b6b54f99431b90b0f6eee252eb4ada6aa0a42e3292a"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
hex(readiness_fingerprint(&identity).unwrap().as_bytes()),
|
||||
"1faf0b0bb7807002e223a113d3da93520bfe91b350380d5d890e20caed3d95af"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn semantically_reordered_policy_has_one_identity() {
|
||||
let expected = derive_policy(policy_fields()).unwrap();
|
||||
let mut reordered = policy_fields();
|
||||
reordered.address_families.reverse();
|
||||
reordered.prefix_rules.reverse();
|
||||
let actual = derive_policy(reordered).unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(actual, expected);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn malformed_policy_inputs_are_refused() {
|
||||
let cases = [
|
||||
("missing family", {
|
||||
let mut fields = policy_fields();
|
||||
fields.address_families.pop();
|
||||
fields
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("enabled IPv6", {
|
||||
let mut fields = policy_fields();
|
||||
fields.address_families[1].disposition = AddressFamilyDispositionValue::Enabled;
|
||||
fields
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("wrong default", {
|
||||
let mut fields = policy_fields();
|
||||
fields.default_actions[0].action = PolicyAction::Deny;
|
||||
fields
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("missing default private deny", {
|
||||
let mut fields = policy_fields();
|
||||
fields.prefix_rules.pop();
|
||||
fields
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("noncanonical CIDR", {
|
||||
let mut fields = policy_fields();
|
||||
fields.prefix_rules[0].network.address = IpAddress::V4([10, 0, 0, 1]);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("oversized prefix", {
|
||||
let mut fields = policy_fields();
|
||||
fields.prefix_rules[0].network.prefix_length = 33;
|
||||
fields
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("prefix family mismatch", {
|
||||
let mut fields = policy_fields();
|
||||
fields.prefix_rules[0].network.address = IpAddress::V6([0; 16]);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("duplicate prefix", {
|
||||
let mut fields = policy_fields();
|
||||
fields.prefix_rules.push(fields.prefix_rules[0]);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("conflicting prefix", {
|
||||
let mut fields = policy_fields();
|
||||
let mut conflicting = fields.prefix_rules[0];
|
||||
conflicting.action = PolicyAction::Allow;
|
||||
fields.prefix_rules.push(conflicting);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("no resolver", {
|
||||
let mut fields = policy_fields();
|
||||
fields.resolvers.clear();
|
||||
fields
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("resolver family mismatch", {
|
||||
let mut fields = policy_fields();
|
||||
fields.resolvers[0].address = IpAddress::V6([0; 16]);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("duplicate resolver", {
|
||||
let mut fields = policy_fields();
|
||||
fields.resolvers.push(fields.resolvers[0]);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
}),
|
||||
];
|
||||
for (name, fields) in cases {
|
||||
assert!(derive_policy(fields).is_err(), "accepted {name}");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn every_attestation_identity_mismatch_is_refused() {
|
||||
let fixture = Fixture::new();
|
||||
let mutations: [(&str, AttestationMutation); 9] = [
|
||||
("domain", |value| {
|
||||
value.domain_id = DomainId::new(repeated(71));
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("generation", |value| {
|
||||
value.generation_id = GenerationId::new(72);
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("configuration", |value| {
|
||||
value.configuration_fingerprint = ConfigurationFingerprint::new(repeated(73));
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("sidecar", |value| {
|
||||
value.network_sidecar_id = NetworkSidecarId::new(repeated(74));
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("policy", |value| {
|
||||
value.derived_policy_digest = DerivedPolicyDigest::new(repeated(75));
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("namespace", |value| {
|
||||
value.enforcement_namespace.inode = InodeId::new(76);
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("namespace device", |value| {
|
||||
value.enforcement_namespace.device = DeviceId::new(77);
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("runtime supervisor", |value| {
|
||||
value.runtime_supervisor = process(78);
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("connectivity helper", |value| {
|
||||
value.connectivity_helper = process(79);
|
||||
}),
|
||||
];
|
||||
for (name, mutate) in mutations {
|
||||
let mut attestation = fixture.attestation.clone();
|
||||
mutate(&mut attestation);
|
||||
let error = accept_network_readiness(
|
||||
&fixture.policy,
|
||||
&fixture.expectation(),
|
||||
attestation,
|
||||
fixture.probe.clone(),
|
||||
&fixture.reachability,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.unwrap_err();
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
error.kind(),
|
||||
NetworkValidationErrorKind::Attestation,
|
||||
"{name}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn every_evidence_identity_mismatch_is_refused() {
|
||||
let fixture = Fixture::new();
|
||||
let mutations: [(&str, EvidenceMutation); 13] = [
|
||||
("outer domain", |value| {
|
||||
value.domain_id = DomainId::new(repeated(81));
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("outer generation", |value| {
|
||||
value.generation_id = GenerationId::new(82);
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("outer sidecar", |value| {
|
||||
value.network_sidecar_id = NetworkSidecarId::new(repeated(83));
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("identity domain", |value| {
|
||||
value.readiness_identity.domain_id = DomainId::new(repeated(84));
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("identity generation", |value| {
|
||||
value.readiness_identity.generation_id = GenerationId::new(85);
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("identity configuration", |value| {
|
||||
value.readiness_identity.configuration_fingerprint =
|
||||
ConfigurationFingerprint::new(repeated(86));
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("identity sidecar", |value| {
|
||||
value.readiness_identity.network_sidecar_id = NetworkSidecarId::new(repeated(87));
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("identity policy", |value| {
|
||||
value.readiness_identity.derived_policy_digest = DerivedPolicyDigest::new(repeated(88));
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("identity namespace", |value| {
|
||||
value.readiness_identity.enforcement_namespace.inode = InodeId::new(89);
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("fingerprint", |value| {
|
||||
value.readiness_fingerprint = ReadinessFingerprint::new(repeated(90));
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("probe domain", |value| {
|
||||
value.reachability_probe.domain_id = DomainId::new(repeated(91));
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("probe generation", |value| {
|
||||
value.reachability_probe.generation_id = GenerationId::new(92);
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("probe namespace", |value| {
|
||||
value.reachability_probe.enforcement_namespace.inode = InodeId::new(93);
|
||||
}),
|
||||
];
|
||||
for (name, mutate) in mutations {
|
||||
let mut evidence = fixture.evidence();
|
||||
mutate(&mut evidence);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
validate_network_readiness_evidence(
|
||||
&fixture.policy,
|
||||
&fixture.expectation(),
|
||||
&evidence,
|
||||
&fixture.reachability,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.is_err(),
|
||||
"accepted {name}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn incomplete_or_failed_reachability_is_refused() {
|
||||
let fixture = Fixture::new();
|
||||
let mutations: [(&str, ProbeMutation); 6] = [
|
||||
("deny reached", |value| {
|
||||
value.denied_destinations[0].unreachable = false;
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("permit unreachable", |value| {
|
||||
value.permitted_destinations[0].reachable = false;
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("missing deny", |value| value.denied_destinations.clear()),
|
||||
("missing permit", |value| {
|
||||
value.permitted_destinations.clear();
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("missing DNS", |value| value.dns_observations.clear()),
|
||||
("empty DNS result", |value| {
|
||||
value.dns_observations[0].resolved_addresses.clear();
|
||||
}),
|
||||
];
|
||||
for (name, mutate) in mutations {
|
||||
let mut probe = fixture.probe.clone();
|
||||
mutate(&mut probe);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
accept_network_readiness(
|
||||
&fixture.policy,
|
||||
&fixture.expectation(),
|
||||
fixture.attestation.clone(),
|
||||
probe,
|
||||
&fixture.reachability,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.is_err(),
|
||||
"accepted {name}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn incomplete_or_malformed_attestation_is_refused() {
|
||||
let fixture = Fixture::new();
|
||||
let mutations: [(&str, AttestationMutation); 3] = [
|
||||
("helper not ready", |value| {
|
||||
value.observation.helper_ready = false;
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("routes not attested", |value| {
|
||||
value.observation.routes_attested = false;
|
||||
}),
|
||||
("noncanonical route", |value| {
|
||||
value.observation.observed_routes[0].address = IpAddress::V4([10, 0, 0, 1]);
|
||||
}),
|
||||
];
|
||||
for (name, mutate) in mutations {
|
||||
let mut attestation = fixture.attestation.clone();
|
||||
mutate(&mut attestation);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
accept_network_readiness(
|
||||
&fixture.policy,
|
||||
&fixture.expectation(),
|
||||
attestation,
|
||||
fixture.probe.clone(),
|
||||
&fixture.reachability,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.is_err(),
|
||||
"accepted {name}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue